primary election endorsements
august primary election endorsements
here is my latest election
cheat sheet . i have been doing these
since the BM era (Before jim McDermott was the 7th district
representative, yes for those of you too young to recall, there was a time back
around the civil war when a man named Mike Lowery was our representative in
congress). for reasons that i can only
assume have something to do with hoping that no one actually votes in this
primary, the state decided not to print a voter's pamphlet for this election. fortunately king county decided to go ahead
and print one, so there are some clues who people like pidgeon, didier,
goodspaceguy, stocky stockwell actually are rather than just a name on the
ballot.
in general i am listing
these in the order they appear on the ballot EXCEPT for the one state supreme
court race, because you absolutely must vote in this one as it is going to be
decided in the primary, it will not beon the general election ballot, so the 12
people who vote in the primaries will make the decision AND we have a choice
between a really good sitting justice and crazy wingnut crackpot stark raving
loony.
state supreme court – justice position 8: steve
gonzalez – absolutely do not cast a
vote for his opponent – he would be wrong in every way
king county proposition 1 (children and family
services center capital levy): yes. based on the
title you would not realize you were voting to build a new prison for kids, but
that's what it is. much as i would like
us to not be incarcerating juveniles, i cannot wave a wand to stop them
committing crimes or change how society deals with the issues that lead to the
conditions that lead to the crime rate or how the legal system punishes
them. when we do imprison kids they
should be housed in a decent building.
the current facility is decrepit and awful, making their time there more
dangerous than it needs to be.
state of washington
governor: jay inslee – and i don't just say that because he will run us
over with a bulldozer if we don't vote for him, or because my dear son george
is working 3 days a week on his campaign.
no, jay is a really good politician, he has voted the right way on a lot
of things for many years, he works hard and will do a great job for the state
in really tough budgetary times. mckenna
is a faux moderate, if elected he is going to go back to his hard right wing
positions that he held years ago when he was on the king county council, he is
absolutely not to be trusted.
lieutenant governor: dave t
summner IV. this is the hardest
race for me. the long term democratic
incumbent is a monumental jerk who really really should not hold this office. he did not bother to attend the democratic
convention this summer and his name was never mentioned when they were making
endorsements for the elections. he is
frankly a dull, boring embarrassment for the democratic party and the state,
but like a weird relative, no one can bring themselves to tell him that no one
wants him to come to christmas so he is there year after year making people
feel awkward. it would be a disaster for
the state if our governor died and this moron took over. his life's passion is singing crappy rock
songs about the dangers of marijuana (the demon weed is destroying the world in
his mind). the republican bill
finkbeiner is a slick conservative who i would not buy a used car from. i wish there was a real liberal/progressive
running. instead there are a couple of
lefty-slightly whacky dudes and a fluoride conspiracy theorist. in the end i went with the neopoulist sumner
who actually sounds like he is aware of and cares about the real issues of the
day (not just being a just-say-no to drugs warrior, or saving the world from
the dangers on healthy teeth.)
secretary of state: greg nickels. i know that
our former mayor has not exactly ignited a firestorm of support from the left,
but i had a really great email exchange with greg back when he was first
considering running and i was really moved by his passion for the office and
the role of being in charge of elections and the state archives. personally i think that this office should be
a non-partisan one, it troubles me deeply that the person in charge of administering
elections fairly is a standard bearer for a political party. that is partly why i would pick greg over the
democratic party darling kathleen drew.
he will be non-partisan and fair.
whatever criticism i might have of his tenure as mayor, he is completely
trustworthy and perfect for this behind the scenes position.
state treasurer: jim mcintire, is unopposed and deserves to continue on. sounds like a horrendously boring position,
and i am glad there are people like him who want to do it!
state auditor: craig pridemore seems to have the passion and
bulldoggeness that a good auditor needs.
attorney general: bob ferguson . it was a tough choice, on the
one hand bob ferguson ,
the most hard working guy on the king county council, smart legal mind, calm
and with good political instincts. on
the other hand, stephen pidgeon who talked on KUOW recently about how crucial
it was to stop Obama from imposing sharia law on the united states by 2015 as
he promised to do when talking to the Islamic botherhood in egypt. he has good points to make, clearly obama is
a radical moslem from kenya
and can easily overturn and modify the US constitution whenever he
pleases. i flipped a coin and ferguson won over
pidgeon. oh yeah there is some buffoon
named reagan dunn also running, but i automatically discount anyone called
reagan.
commissioner of public lands: peter
goldmark. it is very important that we do not allow
clint didier to win election. despite
his insistence to the contrary he is actually an elite french intellectual, not
a redneck asshole moron who will do everything he can to destroy our public
land as he insists. just joking, he is
not french, he is all the things he claims to be and worse. goldmark is the incumbent and has been a
great environmentalist despite the quirks of his office that make it hard to be
that way.
superintendent of public instruction: randy
dorn. the incumbent is not exactly an exciting guy
and he does not really have any great ideas about what to do about public
education, but none of his opponents really sound like they have anything they
would do different and none have raised a penny for the election so do not seem
like they think they have a chance..
lets stick with the devil we know.
insurance commissioner: mike kreidler is the incumbent and is actually one of the
unspoken great public servants in the state.
This is not a high profile position, but it is a crucial one in
protecting the public from one of the most evil forces in society, insurance
companies. especially in the era of
obamacare we need to have someone like mike who is willing to take on and stand
firm against the money grubbing soulless dementors of geico, state farm,
premera and the likes. we absolutely
cannot have one of right wing opponents who are all friends of the insurance
companies in this office, particularly with the possibility that rob mckenna
could win the governor’s office.
state senator: david frockt
seems to be doing a good job since he replaced scott white after scott’s
unexpected and untimely death last year.
david did not draw a single opponent and that is a sign that he has
earned a full four year term.
representative poison 1: gerry
pollet was appointed to replace
david frockt when he stepped up to fill scott white’s position. gerry is really really good, one of the
environmental heroes of the state – fighting over hanford pollution as long as i can
remember. we are very fortunate to have
him as a representative. vote gerry as
often as you can.
representative position 2: sarajane
siegfiedt is a hard working
progressive who absolutely will fulfill the legacy of phyllis gutiérrez kenney the
district for many years.
state supreme court
position 2: susan
owens is the incumbent and deserves reelection. we really do not need to have her replaced by
either of her middle aged white guy opponents.
position 8: steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez,
steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez,
steve gonzalez, steve gonzalez, need I say more?
position 9: bruce hilyer is the best choice here,
despite his undeniable status as a middle aged white guy. richard sanders is trying to get back on the
court and while he was a pretty consistent strong civil libertarian voice on
the court (not to mention the only openly polyamorous justice), his whacky
racist second amendment loving side rather outweighs his good side. mccloud seems well intentioned, but i think
hilyer will be a lot more effective.
ladenburg is a great choice if you are one of the nations 5 remaining
moderate republicans.
court of appeals, division 1, district 1
position 4: ronald e cox is the
unopposed incumbent and deserves to be reelected.
position 7: marlin applewick (ditto from above). i know him
from when he was the 46th district state representative and he is
thoughtful and liberal, everything i would want in a judge.
superior court: (i must admit i leaned on the stranger for
these ones but found nothing to disagree with.)
position 25: elizabeth
berns.
position 29: sean o’donnell.
position 30: doug north
position 42: sue parisien (much as i hate
to think of booting anyone from a secure job in this crummy jobs economy, it
sounds like the incumbent chris washington really is not cutting it in the
judging part of his job, which is kind of a big part of the job
description.
position 46: judy ramseyer.
city of seattle
proposition 1 (library levy): yes with a small y. i kind of agree with the anti- leader on this
campaign chris leman: why the fuck are libararies not part of our city’s basic
budget? it really is fucked up. but voting no is not going to spur the city
council to redoing the budget, we will just have fewer and fewer days and hours
when the libraries are open.
that is all from me.
sorry this is so late, i have actually been swamped with work the last
few months, more so that since 2007 and earlier. hopefully all this construction actually
means a turn around in the economy. As
always, VOTE EARLY, VOTE OFTEN

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home